Sun Lanxin_Reader Response_Final Draft
Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC) is an innovative construction method in which fully prefabricated modules are manufactured off-site in controlled environments and assembled on-site (Building and Construction Authority, 2024). Modules are pre-fitted with electrical, plumbing, and interior finishes, minimising on-site labour and disruptions. The method supports diverse applications, including residential, commercial, and institutional buildings, while integrating seamlessly with traditional construction techniques. According to the study by Tambichik et al. (2022), compared to the traditional Industrialized Building System method, PPVC was able to reduce the construction period by about 35%. Other benefits of PPVC include superior quality, cost-effectiveness, and improved safety by reducing hazards in factory environments. Considering environmental aspects, reducing material usage, saving energy, deducing air and sound pollution are also part of PPVC’s privileges (Aghasizadeh et al., 2022). However, challenges such as high initial investment, transportation logistics, and regulatory compliance must be addressed (Liu et al., 2023).
Prefabricated
Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC) revolutionises modern construction
with its efficiency, sustainability and safety, offering a streamlined solution
to traditional construction challenges.
PPVC significantly
enhances construction efficiency by reducing project timelines. One of the examples
using PPVC in Singapore is the clement canopy tower, the project ended up with
saving construction time up to 30% (BCA, 2019). In the study done by Tambichik
et al. (2022), they compared three projects constructed by PPVC and
Industrialized Building System (IBS) respectively, based on the similar numbers
of units constructed. The results showed that the project applied PPVC was able
to complete 35 classrooms in 56 days whereas the other two applied IBS
completed in 91 and 86 days respectively, showing that the construction period
of PPVC is 34.9% shorter than IBS. The main reason of such efficiency is that
off-site module manufacturing eliminates weather delays and site constraints.
Since the modules arrive pre-fitted with essential components, on-site assembly
is quick and labour efficient. The reduction in construction time not only
lowers labour costs but also allows developers to complete projects faster,
benefiting both the industry and end users.
PPVC aligns with
global sustainability initiatives and promotes environmentally responsible
building practices. Analysis done by Hong et al. (2015) to investigate the
life-cycle energy use of PPVC construction, found that the recycling process
could achieve 16%–24% energy reduction. They also found out that “apart from
reusability, energy savings are also obtained from waste reduction and high-quality
control, saving 4%–14% of the total life-cycle energy consumption”. PPVC
reduces waste through precise material usage and controlled fabrication in
factory settings. Traditional construction often results in excess material
waste due to inaccurate on-site measurements and inefficient resource
management. Measured data of a case project in China studied by Jiang et al.
(2019) showed that prefabrication can save 60% of steel, 56% of concrete, and
77% of formwork on site. In contrast, PPVC optimizes material use, allowing for
recycling and minimizing construction debris.
PPVC enhances
workplace safety by shifting construction activities to controlled factory
environments. The Building and Construction Authority (2024) reports that PPVC
significantly reduces on-site accidents by minimizing hazardous activities such
as scaffolding work and heavy machinery operations. Traditional construction
exposes workers to various risks, including falls, equipment-related injuries,
and exposure to hazardous materials. With PPVC, most construction processes
occur in a factory setting, where standardized safety measures reduce the
likelihood of workplace injuries. Improved safety conditions enhance worker
well-being and contribute to overall project efficiency by reducing
accident-related delays.
Despite its
advantages, PPVC presents challenges in high initial investment. In the survey
by Liu et al. (2023), the most significant challenge voted by the interviewees
is Volatile Economic and Social Conditions. PPVC projects demand substantial
upfront investments in module design and production, making it difficult to
secure funding and maintain cash flow, especially during economic uncertainty.
This financial burden makes PPVC projects more susceptible to risks compared to
traditional construction methods. Furthermore, the successful assembly and
installation of prefabricated modules depend heavily on a skilled workforce.
PPVC revolutionizes
the construction industry by improving efficiency, promoting sustainability,
and enhancing worker safety. Its ability to reduce construction time, minimize
waste, and create safer work environments makes it a promising alternative to traditional
construction methods. However, the challenge of economic investment must be
addressed to maximize its potential. As the industry evolves, advancements in
transportation infrastructure and regulatory frameworks will be crucial for the
widespread adoption of PPVC.
References:
Aghasizadeh, S.,
Tabadkani, A., Hajirasouli, A., & Banihashemi, S. (2022). Environmental and
economic performance of prefabricated construction: A review. Environmental
Impact Assessment Review, 97, 106897-.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106897
Building and
Construction Authority. (2019). Case Study - The Clement Canopy.
https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/prefabricated-prefinished-volumetric-construction-ppvc/prefabricated-prefinished-volumetric-construction-case-study-the-clement-canopy
Building and
Construction Authority. (2024). Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric
Construction (PPVC). https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/prefabricated-prefinished-volumetric-construction-ppvc/
Hong, J., Shen, G.
Q., Mao, C., Li, Z., & Li, K. (2016). Life-cycle energy analysis of
prefabricated building components: an input–output-based hybrid model. Journal
of cleaner production, 112, 2198-2207.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652615014146#sec1
Jiang, Y., Zhao,
D., Wang, D., & Xing, Y. (2019). Sustainable performance of buildings
through modular prefabrication in the construction phase: A comparative study. Sustainability,
11(20), 5658. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5658
Liu, Z., Hwang,
B.-G., & Lim, J. M. (2023). Prefabricated and Prefinished Volumetric
Construction: Assessing Implementation Status, Perceived Benefits, and Critical
Risk Factors in the Singapore Built Environment Sector. Journal of
Management in Engineering, 39(6).
https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5455
Tambichik, M. A.,
Sherliza, Z. S., & Abdullah, N. A. (2022). Comparative Study between
Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC) and IBS 2D: A Case
Study of School Extension Project in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series. Earth
and Environmental Science, 1022(1), 12016-.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1022/1/012016
Comments
Post a Comment